Clive Sutton says NO to ABS on the Today Programme

This morning (6 October), Clive Sutton, honorary secretary of SPG ,appeared on the Today Programme to say NO to ABS.

If you missed it, you can find it here.

Why the legal Big Bang is so dangerous for the rule of law

The following comment piece by Clive Sutton, honorary secretary of the Solicitor Sole Practitioners Group (SPG), appeared in the The Times on 22 September 2011

 

 

 

 Why the legal Big Bang is so dangerous for the rule of law

Much like in 1986, warnings were given about the deregulation of the financial markets.

Without the Big Bang, banks would not have been able to indulge in their commercial “casino” lending that led to the financial crisis and the present recession.

The introduction of Alternative Business Structures will have far reaching consequences that the Lord Chancellor has not considered.

They are:

* the compromising of independent legal advice via the corrupting influence of the profit incentive and the loss of viable independent sole practitioners on the market.

* English firms will be unable to open offices in the other European or American jurisdictions because commercial ownership is not compatible with those jurisdictions, their European and American counterparts will instead be able to exploit the British marketplace.

Small and medium-sized businesses have a proven track record of providing the vital growth that our economy is in desperate need of. There is a real danger that your high street solicitor will go the way of other high street providers when a supermarket comes to town, that is, out of business.

The rule of law, that the Justice Secretary recognises as one of our greatest exports, is threatened when independent, bespoke legal advice is not on offer. Supermarket legal advice may lead to generic, cost-driven services that threaten often vulnerable clients access to justice – turning the client into a customer.

Alternative Business Structures are untried and untested, and we would urge Ken Clarke to think again before putting his name to the system that corrupts the established and respective legal system Britain has built up over centuries.

The following comment piece by Clive Sutton, honorary secretary of the Solicitor Sole Practitioners Group (SPG), appeared in the Times newspaper on 1st September 2011

Alternative business structures — is there no alternative?

The news that Rocket Lawyer, an American firm, is planning to offer internet-based legal services to rival the high street’s offering may soon develop into a trend.

The impending implementation in November of Part 5 of the Legal Services Act may lead to a revolution in legal service provision, with the prospect of supermarkets providing legal advice along with your bread, milk and car insurance.

If it comes into force, non-lawyers for the first time will be able to fully own and invest in law firms thus creating alternative business structures (ABSs).

Essentially, Part 5 will allow private companies to own and control law firms, making handsome returns on their investment in the process. Initially, it may be only the large corporates that are able to create ABSs, but it is not hard to imagine a moment when others will enter the market place in the same way as claims farmers came in to make profits from the deregulation of legal insurance services.

This will have an impact on the legal landscape. With ABSs, market forces and commercial imperative will have a far greater role in legal service provision than now.

Of course, profit incentives exist under the status quo — there are plenty of rich lawyers — but it is the scale of the threatened change that has concerned many solicitors.

Primarily, many high street and sole practice solicitors are concerned that independence of thought and legal advice will be at risk. Employed solicitors working in an ABS may find themselves under greater pressure to promote their employer, their employer’s products and views (and even if they are not, they may be perceived to be doing so). This could cause a breakdown in trust between the consumer of legal services and the provider.

Trust is crucial whenever legal expertise is given — you need it when you face criminal charges, when your family could be pulled apart or when you are moving house. It is vital, and threatened by this change.

The Trojan horse of market forces is always welcomed into the citadel of service provision on the basis of lowering costs and improving choice — but not by all.

The Solicitor Sole Practitioners Group, representing 4,500 solicitors in England and Wales who practise with no partners, has expressed concerns to the Government about the dangers of this course of action, concerns that go wider than solicitors losing their independence.

There is a real danger that your high street solicitor will go the way of other high street providers when a supermarket comes to town, that is, out of business, perversely reducing consumer choice, and consequently access to justice.

Sole practitioners are not alone in their ABS scepticism: no jurisdiction in the world, bar the states of Victoria and Queensland in Australia, have introduced them.

At a time when legal aid budgets are being slashed, with firm after firm going out of business leaving advice deserts in service provision across large parts of the country, many will believe that opening up the market is an easy fix.

The problem with this easy fix is that it will have profound consequences. There is still time before Parliament votes on implementing Part 5, and it is vital that this period is used to debate whether this really is the change legal service provision needs.

The author is honorary secretary of the Solicitor Sole Practitioners Group